Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 12 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2022-07-21 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro is better than Google Pixel 6a, with an 84.9 score against 76.4. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12 operating system. IPhone 11 Pro's body is just a bit thinner than Google Pixel 6a, but it is a bit heavier and was released many years before.
IPhone 11 Pro has a much greater hardware performance than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Hexa-Core processor, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processor. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a brighter display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater screen pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro takes clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 6a, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a tinier aperture and a back camera with less MP resolution. The Google Pixel 6a features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 6a counts with a much longer battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 4410mAh of battery capacity instead of 3046mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 6a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 6a. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 6a, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.