Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro has a score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A31's score of 81.3. IPhone 11 Pro's body is just a little bit thinner but just a little bit heavier than Galaxy A31, and they were released with only a couple of months difference. IPhone 11 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy A31 has Android 10 operating system.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a superior processing power than Galaxy A31, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone 11 Pro has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater count of pixels per display inch and a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436.
Galaxy A31 takes a bit better videos and photos than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a lot bigger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A31 features a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 64 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.