Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is better than the Apple iPhone 11 Pro, having a overall score of 97.6 against 84.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold and Apple iPhone 11 Pro were released with only a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is a lot heavier but also somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy Fold comes with Android 9.0 Pie operating system, and Apple iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system.
IPhone 11 Pro features a brighter screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the display. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Fold, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Galaxy Fold has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage. IPhone 11 Pro and Galaxy Fold both have extremely similar cameras, and although the Galaxy Fold has a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video, they both have the same (4K) video definition, a 12 MP back facing camera, the same video frame rate and a same size back camera sensor.
Galaxy Fold features a really longer battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 3046mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way more expensive than iPhone 11 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.