Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 10.35 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M20, getting an 84.9 score against 78.9. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy M20 works with Android 10 OS. Even though Apple iPhone 11 Pro and Samsung Galaxy M20 were released only 8 months apart, Apple iPhone 11 Pro's design is just a bit heavier but a bit thinner.
The iPhone 11 Pro features a superior performance than Galaxy M20, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better amount of pixels in each inch in the display and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos, a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light environments and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M20 features much more memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.