Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is better than Apple iPhone 11 Pro's overall score of 84.9. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G comes with Android 13 operating system, and Apple iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a somewhat heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than Apple iPhone 11 Pro.
The iPhone 11 Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and they are also slower and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. IPhone 11 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a bit smaller screen, a just a bit worse screen density and a way worse resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots way better photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a much better video definition.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than iPhone 11 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.