Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-20 | -- |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.63 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy S25, getting a overall score of 84.9 against 82.6. IPhone 11 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy S25 has Android 14 OS. The Galaxy S25 has a little sharper screen than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a much brighter screen and a little larger screen.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. IPhone 11 Pro features a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has less processing cores and 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Galaxy S25 captures greater photographs and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a camera with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution, a lot higher video resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S25 has greater battery duration than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs more than the Galaxy S25, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S25. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S25, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.