Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.35 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro has a general score of 84.9, which is much better than Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. IPhone 11 Pro is a way newer and thinner phone than the Galaxy S7 Active, although it is just a little heavier. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a slightly better looking display than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and much lower brightness, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a little bit higher count of pixels per inch of display.
IPhone 11 Pro counts with a superior processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 11 Pro also has a 64-bits processing unit and more cores. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bigger memory to install games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 200 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features improved battery life than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3046mAh. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and video in low light situations, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video quality, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.