Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2021-03-12 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy XCover 5, with a general score of 84.9 against 78.1. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy XCover 5 works with Android 11 operating system. IPhone 11 Pro is an older and just a little bit heavier device than Galaxy XCover 5, but Apple was able to make it thinner anyway.
IPhone 11 Pro counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a greater screen density, a much higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a superior processor than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. IPhone 11 Pro features a superior camera than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a much less mega-pixels back camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
IPhone 11 Pro counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 2 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.