Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 463 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 84.9 score against 80.1. IPhone 11 Pro is a noticeably thinner and much lighter cellphone than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when they were released with only 7 months difference. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy XCover FieldPro works with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
IPhone 11 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little bit worse pixel quantity per screen inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a little faster processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower number of cores, and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3046mAh.
IPhone 11 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or video in low light environments, and they both have a 0.39 inches back camera sensor and the same resolution back-facing camera, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a lot higher video definition.
The iPhone 11 Pro not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.