Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, having a overall score of 84.9 against 83.8. The iPhone 11 Pro is a a little bit lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but both of them are equally thin. IPhone 11 Pro features a bit better processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel count per inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same aperture, the same back-facing camera sensor size, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also has higher video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has much more storage for applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has just a bit longer battery life than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 12% bigger battery size.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.