Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, having a score of 84.9 against 80.2. Even being the best we are comparing here, it must be noted that it is also a just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier phone. The iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 operating system.
The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a sharper display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a just a bit higher pixel density. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 192 GB more internal memory.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and they are also slower and 8 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has longer battery life than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3046mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as ZTE Axon 10 Pro. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.