Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro has a global score of 84.9, which is slightly better than ZTE Axon 20's score of 77.8. The iPhone 11 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, and ZTE Axon 20 counts with Android 10 OS. Although iPhone 11 Pro is older and just a little thicker than the ZTE Axon 20, it's construction is still a bit lighter.
IPhone 11 Pro features a bit faster processor than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has lesser RAM and 2 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. IPhone 11 Pro has a much better display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixels density and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution.
ZTE Axon 20 captures greater photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
ZTE Axon 20 has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. ZTE Axon 20 has a much longer battery life than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 4220mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as ZTE Axon 20. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy ZTE Axon 20, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.