Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 14.x | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 477 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 mini has a score of 88.5, which is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. The iPhone 12 mini construction is newer, thinner and incredibly lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo. The iPhone 12 mini works with iOS 14.x OS, while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 OS.
The iPhone 12 mini has a better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a 64-bit processor, 1 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and also faster). Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit sharper screen than iPhone 12 mini, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo's memory to store more games and applications is very similar to the iPhone 12 mini one, both have the same internal memory capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a very superior battery performance than iPhone 12 mini, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity against 2227mAh.
The iPhone 12 mini takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a back camera with lot less mega-pixels and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Although Apple iPhone 12 mini is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.