Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 has a general score of 85, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 overall score. Apple iPhone 8's body is just a bit thinner than Google Pixel 4a, but it's a bit heavier and was released many years before. Google Pixel 4a counts with a little more vivid screen than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a larger screen and more pixels per screen inch.
Apple iPhone 8 features just a little better performance than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Apple iPhone 8 has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
IPhone 8 takes clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a camera in the back with lesser mega-pixels resolution, a worse (4K) video quality, a tinier camera aperture and a tinier back camera sensor giving a lower image quality. Google Pixel 4a has a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 3140mAh battery size.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4a. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone 8, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 4a, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.