Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-22 | -- |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.22 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 3.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a general score of 85, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s 82.2 global score. Apple iPhone 8 counts with a better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels density and a better 750 x 1334 resolution.
The iPhone 8 and the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) feature really similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, they have equal internal storage. The Apple iPhone 8 has a lot better performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 2 lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a much longer battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s camera is very similar to iPhone 8's camera, and although the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a way more MP back facing camera, they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.