Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 is a little bit better than the LG Q70, with a overall score of 85 against 77.9. Apple iPhone 8 is an incredibly older phone than the LG Q70, but Apple could make it a little thinner and lighter. The iPhone 8 features just a bit better looking display than LG Q70, although it has a lot worse resolution of 750 x 1334, a little lower screen pixels density and a much smaller screen.
LG Q70 has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone 8, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Apple iPhone 8 counts with a better CPU than LG Q70, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The LG Q70 has a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has a 120% more battery capacity. The LG Q70 counts with just a bit better camera than iPhone 8, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Q70 also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera and a larger back camera sensor capturing better quality photos.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Q70. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG Q70, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.