Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-12-05 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is slightly better than Motorola Moto G9 Power, with an 85 score against 78.6. The iPhone 8 construction is way lighter and notably thinner than Motorola Moto G9 Power, although it was released 3 years before. IPhone 8 features a quite superior hardware performance than Moto G9 Power, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM and 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone 8 has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little worse resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. The Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a little bit more storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Moto G9 Power has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh. Moto G9 Power shoots slightly better pictures and videos than iPhone 8, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Moto G9 Power also has a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.