Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-09-22 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is better than Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a general score of 85 against 75.8. IPhone 8 is a newer and a little lighter phone than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it's a little bit thicker. Moto Z Force counts with a little more vivid display than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px, way more pixels per screen inch and a bigger screen.
The Moto Z Force has a better memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone 8, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The iPhone 8 has a superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a 64-bits CPU.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much longer battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity. The iPhone 8 features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a worse video quality and a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z Force. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto Z Force, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.