Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2, having an 85 score against 79.7. The iPhone 8 is an much older device than the OPPO Find X2, but Apple made it a little thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. Apple iPhone 8 counts with a bit faster processor than OPPO Find X2, because although it has lesser RAM and less and slower processing cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
OPPO Find X2 has a more vivid screen than iPhone 8, because it has a brighter display, a much higher 1440 x 3168 resolution, a way higher pixels count per screen inch and a way larger screen. The OPPO Find X2 takes better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger diafragm aperture, a camera with much more megapixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
The OPPO Find X2 features as much memory capacity to install games and applications as the iPhone 8 one, both have the same 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X2 features a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.