Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a general score of 85, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 overall score. IPhone 8's body is a bit thinner and lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it was released 3 years before. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit sharper screen than iPhone 8, because it has a just a little higher pixel amount per screen inch, a brighter screen, a really larger screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Apple iPhone 8 and the OPPO Find X2 Neo both feature incredibly similar memory capacity to store more games and applications, both of them have equal 256 GB internal storage. IPhone 8 has a little faster processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 less and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a much better camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a larger aperture, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.