Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 has a score of 85, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A13 5G's 82.1 score. Apple iPhone 8's construction is thinner and lighter than the Galaxy A13 5G, although it was released 4 years before. IPhone 8 has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has lesser RAM and 2 lesser cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a quite lower 750 x 1334 pixels resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little higher count of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A13 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Apple iPhone 8 features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy A13 5G has a really longer battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 175 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.