Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-09-22 | 2019-10-05 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 326 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.08 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is better than the Galaxy A20s, with an 85 score against 77. IPhone 8's construction is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy A20s, even though it was released 2 years before. The iPhone 8 has a more vivid display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little bit worse 750 x 1334 pixels resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixels amount per inch of screen.
The iPhone 8 features a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The Apple iPhone 8 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a worse resolution camera in the back, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Apple iPhone 8 also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
IPhone 8 features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A20s features a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.