Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A22 5G, getting a general score of 85 against 84.6. IPhone 8's construction is thinner and lighter than the Galaxy A22 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The iPhone 8 features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A22 5G, although it has a way smaller screen, a lot worse 750 x 1334 resolution and a just a little worse pixel amount per inch in the screen.
The iPhone 8 features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory and lesser cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. IPhone 8 has a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy A22 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh. The Galaxy A22 5G captures a little bit better pictures and videos than iPhone 8, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a lot more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.