Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has a score of 85, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. Even though iPhone 8 is much older than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is much lighter and somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better looking display than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a way bigger screen, a just a little more pixels per inch of screen, much more brightness and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Galaxy A25 5G features a slightly better camera than iPhone 8, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a back facing camera with a much better 50 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a greater memory for games and applications than iPhone 8, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 175 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.