Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 has a global score of 85, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A35 5G's global score of 79.4. Even though Apple iPhone 8 is much older than Galaxy A35 5G, it's body is just a bit thinner and noticeably lighter. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little bit better screen than iPhone 8, because although it has much less brightness, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a really bigger screen and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The iPhone 8 has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The iPhone 8 has an extremely better processor than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Galaxy A35 5G features a very superior battery life than iPhone 8, because it has a 175 percent bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a way larger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.