Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is a bit better than the Apple iPhone 8's general score of 85. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is noticeably newer, but somewhat thicker and extremely heavier than the Apple iPhone 8. The Apple iPhone 8 has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a just a little lower display density, a lot lower 750 x 1334 resolution and a much smaller display.
IPhone 8 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 1821mAh. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes much better photographs and videos than iPhone 8, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera and a way larger back camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.