Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a little bit better than iPhone 8, having a 91.1 score against 85. The Samsung Galaxy A52s body is extremely newer, but much heavier and somewhat thicker than iPhone 8. The iPhone 8 has a little better processing power than Galaxy A52s, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 8 has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, although it has a way smaller display, a lot lower 750 x 1334 pixels resolution and a quite lower count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A52s counts with a much better camera than iPhone 8, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same aperture, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way more MP back facing camera and a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a very superior battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.