Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-09-22 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is better than the Galaxy A70's 76.9 global score. The iPhone 8 is an older phone than Galaxy A70, but Apple managed to build it a bit thinner and lighter. The Apple iPhone 8 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a just a little lower pixel number per inch in the display, a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334px and a way smaller display.
The Galaxy A70 features just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The iPhone 8 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone 8 takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the iPhone 8 also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 1821mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A70. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 8, else you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.