Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-09-22 | 2016-06-01 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has a general score of 85, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy C7's 77.7 global score. The iPhone 8 body is newer and lighter, but a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy C7. The iPhone 8 features a superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy C7, although it has a much lower 750 x 1334 resolution, a little smaller screen and a bit lower pixel amount per display inch. IPhone 8 counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Apple iPhone 8 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a back camera with a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger camera aperture. The Galaxy C7 features a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.