Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-09-22 | 2017-04-07 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Blue and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is a bit better than the Galaxy C7 Pro, getting a overall score of 85 against 78.4. Even though the Apple iPhone 8 and the Galaxy C7 Pro were released with only a couple months difference, Apple iPhone 8's body is lighter but a bit thicker. IPhone 8 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy C7 Pro, although it has a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334px, a quite smaller screen and a just a bit lower screen density.
The iPhone 8 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 8 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone 8 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a camera with much less MP resolution, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture. The Galaxy C7 Pro features a superior battery life than iPhone 8, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.