Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2022-03-22 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a global score of 85, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy F23's general score of 84.6. The iPhone 8 features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy F23, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, a much lower resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels and a much smaller display.
The Apple iPhone 8 has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F23, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The iPhone 8 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy F23, although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
The iPhone 8 features a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy F23, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F23 features a much better battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 175% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.