Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 326 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a score of 85 against 80.1. IPhone 8 is an older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but Apple was able to build it notably thinner and a lot lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better looking display than iPhone 8, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px, a quite larger screen and a lot better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
IPhone 8 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. IPhone 8 features more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh. The iPhone 8 features a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and videos in low-light environments and a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the iPhone 8 also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Apple iPhone 8 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.