Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Sony |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2015-06-16 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is a bit better than Xperia Z4v, having an 85 score against 78.8. IPhone 8 is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and thinner than the Xperia Z4v. Xperia Z4v has a much better display than iPhone 8, because it has a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution, a much higher pixels count per screen inch and a little bit bigger screen.
The iPhone 8 counts with just a little better performance than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has lesser processing cores (although they are faster), a lower amount of RAM and doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The Xperia Z4v shoots clearer photos and videos than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images, and they both have the same video quality, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Apple iPhone 8 has a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. Xperia Z4v has a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has a 65 percent larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xperia Z4v. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone 8, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Xperia Z4v, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.