Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-09-22 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting an 85 score against 80.2. The Apple iPhone 8 design is lighter and a bit thinner than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it was released a little bit over a year before. The iPhone 8 features a little faster CPU than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 10 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone 8 counts with just a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has a lot worse 750 x 1334 pixels resolution, a little less pixels per screen inch and a way smaller display. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 8, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal storage, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a much longer battery life than iPhone 8, because it has a 120% larger battery capacity. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a superior camera than iPhone 8, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
The iPhone 8 is a lot more expensive than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.