Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-03-30 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a global score of 85, which is much better than ZTE Axon 11's overall score of 76. Despite of the fact that iPhone 8 is a lot older than the ZTE Axon 11, it's construction is lighter and just a little bit thinner. Apple iPhone 8 counts with a bit better processing power than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 8 features a little more vivid display than ZTE Axon 11, although it has a lot smaller display, a way worse 750 x 1334 resolution and a little bit less pixels per screen inch. ZTE Axon 11 counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 2 TB.
ZTE Axon 11 counts with a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 120 percent greater battery size. The iPhone 8 counts with a little bit better camera than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a camera with lot less MP resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.