Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is slightly better than ZTE Axon 20, having an 85 score against 77.8. Although Apple iPhone 8 is incredibly older than the ZTE Axon 20, it's construction is just a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter. The Apple iPhone 8 features just a little better performance than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The iPhone 8 counts with a little more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 20, although it has a way worse 750 x 1334 resolution, a just a little inferior pixel amount per screen inch and a much smaller screen. ZTE Axon 20 features a way better camera than iPhone 8, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better resolution back camera.
The iPhone 8 features a superior memory to install games and applications than ZTE Axon 20, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The ZTE Axon 20 has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 132% larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as ZTE Axon 20. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get ZTE Axon 20, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.