Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-03-18 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) has an overall score of 86.6, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 overall score. IPhone SE (2022) is a extremely newer device, and it is also somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than the Google Pixel 3a XL. The iPhone SE (2022) works with iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 OS.
IPhone SE (2022) counts with a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, a lot smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 750 x 1334. Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with as much memory capacity for games and applications as the iPhone SE (2022), they have equal internal storage. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a way better battery lifetime than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2018mAh. IPhone SE (2022) counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a lesser mega pixels back facing camera, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Although iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a XL. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.