Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | HTC |
| iOS 15.x | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-03-18 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 326 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2022) has a global score of 86.6, which is better than HTC One M9's global score of 77.7. IPhone SE (2022)'s design is notably newer, just a little bit lighter and way thinner than the HTC One M9. IPhone SE (2022) counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while HTC One M9 works with Android 5.0 operating system.
IPhone SE (2022) has a bit faster processor than HTC One M9, because although it has a lower number of cores and doesn't have an extra graphics processor, and they both have a 64 bits processing unit, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory. HTC One M9 has a more vivid display than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a bit bigger screen, a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a much higher 1920 x 1080 resolution.
HTC One M9 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the HTC One M9 also counts with a camera with a much better resolution. HTC One M9 has slightly more memory capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
HTC One M9 has a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 41 percent more battery size.
Although iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC One M9. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone SE (2022), otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the HTC One M9, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.