Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | HTC |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2022-03-18 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 326 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a score of 86.6, which is better than HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. Apple iPhone SE (2022)'s body is incredibly newer, somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra has a slightly better looking screen than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560, a lot higher pixel density and a bigger display.
IPhone SE (2022) has a greater hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone SE (2022) also has a greater number of cores and a 64-bits processor. The HTC U Ultra and Apple iPhone SE (2022) count with quite similar cameras, and although the HTC U Ultra has worse 30 fps video frame rates, they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size diafragm aperture and the same resolution back camera.
HTC U Ultra features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. HTC U Ultra has a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2018mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Apple iPhone SE (2022) is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.