Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| iOS 15.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-03-18 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 general score. Apple iPhone SE (2022)'s body is extremely newer, thinner and a lot lighter than LG G8X ThinQ. Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while LG G8X ThinQ counts with Android 10 operating system.
IPhone SE (2022) counts with a quite superior hardware performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone SE (2022) and the LG G8X ThinQ both count with similar screens, although the LG G8X ThinQ also has a bit greater display pixels density, a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much larger screen.
The LG G8X ThinQ has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ has a slightly better camera than iPhone SE (2022). Both of them have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a way better battery life than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2018mAh.
Although iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G8X ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy iPhone SE (2022), else you can save some dollars and buy the LG G8X ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.