Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-03-18 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 429.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. Even though Apple iPhone SE (2022) is a little bit thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force, it's lighter and also notably newer. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat OS.
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) features a superior hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone SE (2022) also has a 64-bit processor and 2 more processing cores. Moto Z Force features just a bit better display than iPhone SE (2022), because it has way more pixels per inch in the display, a lot better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a larger screen.
The Motorola Moto Z Force takes clearer photographs and videos than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 21 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 73% larger battery size.
IPhone SE (2022) is a lot more expensive than Moto Z Force, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.