Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-03-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 429.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is a bit better than the iPhone SE (2022)'s 86.6 overall score. Although it's the best in this review, the Motorola razr (2020) is an older, just a bit thicker and heavier device than the iPhone SE (2022). Motorola razr (2020) works with Android 11 OS, and iPhone SE (2022) counts with iOS 15.x OS.
The iPhone SE (2022) has a bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a quite worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, a way smaller display and a way lower resolution of 750 x 1334. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) features a greater performance than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a much better camera than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations and a camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a much better storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola razr (2020) has a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 2800mAh battery size instead of 2018mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Apple iPhone SE (2022), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Apple iPhone SE (2022). If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Apple iPhone SE (2022), giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.