Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-03-18 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a global score of 86.6, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) design is notably newer, a lot thinner and extremely lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
IPhone SE (2022) features a bit more powerful CPU than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. IPhone SE (2022) has a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334px and a really smaller display.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has much more storage to install games and applications than iPhone SE (2022), because it has more internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior battery duration than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2018mAh. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better camera than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, iPhone SE (2022) is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.