Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2022-03-18 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2022) has a score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A50's 83.8 global score. The iPhone SE (2022) is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy A50. The iPhone SE (2022) features a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50, although it has a lot smaller screen, a bit lower pixel number in each display inch and a way worse 750 x 1334 pixels resolution. Galaxy A50 has a very superior storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better battery life than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2018mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit better camera than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and video and a back facing camera with way more MP.
Although iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A50. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy A50, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.