Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2022-03-18 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 429.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the iPhone SE (2022)'s global score of 86.6. Although it's the best in this review, Galaxy A52's body is older, heavier and somewhat thicker than the iPhone SE (2022). IPhone SE (2022) features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A52, although it has a lot smaller display, a bit inferior pixel number per screen inch and a lot worse resolution of 750 x 1334.
Galaxy A52 features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior camera than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera. Galaxy A52 features a much longer battery duration than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.