Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2022-03-18 | 2018-11-15 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 429.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) is slightly better than Galaxy A9 (2018), getting a score of 86.6 against 85.2. The iPhone SE (2022) is a much newer device, and it is also notably lighter and a little thinner than the Galaxy A9 (2018). IPhone SE (2022) features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), although it has a much lower 750 x 1334px resolution, a just a little lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a much smaller screen.
The iPhone SE (2022) features a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has less cpu cores (although faster) and 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a slightly better camera than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a larger camera aperture and a camera with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone SE (2022), because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy A9 (2018) has a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has an 88% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.