Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2022-03-18 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) is slightly better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a score of 86.6 against 80.4. IPhone SE (2022)'s body is much newer, somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a quite superior processing power than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has lesser cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better screen than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a lot greater number of pixels per display inch, a larger display and a lot higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
IPhone SE (2022) counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 12 MP resolution back camera, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with faster video frame rate.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a way better battery life than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 59% bigger battery capacity.
IPhone SE (2022) is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.