Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2022-03-18 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) is better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having an 86.6 score against 75.8. Apple iPhone SE (2022)'s body is notably newer, way thinner and notably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The iPhone SE (2022) counts with a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone SE (2022) also has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a 64-bit processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a better screen than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because although it has much more opaque display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the screen, a quite larger screen and a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The iPhone SE (2022) captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality and a 12 mega-pixels camera in the back, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 200 GB. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a much longer battery duration than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 98% greater battery size.
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) costs a lot more money than Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.