Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2022-03-18 | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S9, with an 86.6 score against 83.3. Apple iPhone SE (2022)'s construction is notably newer, thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S9. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a slightly better screen than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a way greater pixels density, a way better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a bigger display.
The iPhone SE (2022) has a better hardware performance than Galaxy S9, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64 bits processor. The Galaxy S9 has a superior storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S9 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 takes a bit better pictures and videos than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same resolution camera in the back and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S9 also has a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy S9 features a very superior battery duration than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S9. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone SE (2022), else you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy S9, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.