Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-03-18 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 429.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 326 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) has a general score of 86.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. The iPhone SE (2022) body is newer, incredibly lighter and thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. The iPhone SE (2022) counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy XCover FieldPro works with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
The iPhone SE (2022) has a superior processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64 bits processor. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a slightly better looking screen than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a quite larger screen, much more pixels per inch in the screen and a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much greater memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. IPhone SE (2022) features a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Apple iPhone SE (2022) is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.